Agent vs.

Are you looking for a web-based K-12 program? There are plenty of options on the market, including the ever-popular Agent and

These two keyboarding curriculums can both be a great way to teach your students to type, but it may be difficult to decide which one is right for your school or district.

We have identified the most important features of each program so you can choose the one that best fits your needs. Keep reading to see how they compare!

Student Engagement and Typing Gamification

Both Agent and feature interactive lessons with plenty of games and videos to keep students engaged.

Students also get achievement badges and a class leaderboard to motivate them to keep going.

Both typing programs also allow students to personalize their dashboards with different “skins”.

Typing Agent has a slight edge over in student engagement features because it includes extra incentives, including earned GritCoins that students can redeem to play more games and Experience Points that allow them to personalize their avatars.

However, both programs are great in this area.


Typing Skill Reporting Features

Both programs have extensive reporting capabilities for teachers and administrators. Educators can manage students at the class, district, or school level, choose from a variety of report types, look at historical data, set up automatic grading, and see what kids are doing in real time.

Teachers can filter data by classes, units, and/or date ranges to see student progress measures such as

In addition to all these features, Agent provides the additional option of building your own custom report, giving this program a slight edge over Again, both programs are strong in this category.

Integration Features

Both Agent and have single sign-on options with Clever, Google Classroom, and ClassLink. Agent also provides an SSO option with Microsoft Office 365.

Typing Lesson Customization

Agent and both personalize each student’s experience by delivering keyboarding lessons and practice based on their individual proficiency level.

Students get instant feedback on their performance and are given a natural progression path to harder lessons.

However, lacks Agent’s robust teacher customization features, such as the ability for teachers to assign custom lessons to students.

Teachers can review lessons to ensure the content fits into their lesson plans, but have fewer hands-on curriculum choices compared to. Overall, Agent has an edge in customization features.

Foreign Language and ELL Features

Both Agent and make their curriculum and instruction available in English and Spanish. Students who speak Spanish as their first language can avoid language barrier issues.

Students who are learning a second language can also choose to exercise their language skills during class.

Digital Literacy and Coding

Both programs include extra tech education features to prepare students for a digital world.

In particular, both programs allow teachers to introduce students to some aspects of coding, although Agent’s curriculum focuses more on code accurately while is more focused on coding basics.

In addition to the lessons in code,Agent has a complete ISTE-aligned digital citizenship curriculum with superhero-themed videos and interactive student quizzes, plu typing ctivities that reinforce the concepts. also includes additional lessons in online safety and behavior. Overall, these programs are roughly equal in terms of digital learning.

Workplace Preparation includes a career readiness and workplace professionalism curriculum that is not available through Agent. Topics include career preparation, communication and collaboration, computer hardware and maintenance, evaluating software, professional writing, presentations, and more. Agent does not include these features, so has an clear advantage in this category.


Both Agent and include some accessibility features, including text-to-speech dictation.

Agent includes additional ADA compliant features such as closed captioning for hearing-impaired students, dyslexic font, and one-handed, so we give this program a clear edge in accessibility.

ALSO READ : konicaminolta it is not possible to login now

Pricing has a free version, but it includes prominent ads that may be distracting for students.

If your school wishes to provide an ad-free keyboarding curriculum, there are paid options with both Agent

Typing Agent and the ad-free version of com both have variable pricing depending on the number of students.

Large schools and districts can get bulk discounts as low as $0.90 per student with or $1.14 per student with the ad-free version of

Ultimately, the question of which program provides better pricing depends on the size of your school and whether the administration wishes to avoid exposing students to ads.

In Review: Which Typing Program is Right for My Students?

Both programs have a few features that the other program lacks and pricing options that may benefit your school.

Agent has more student engagement, reporting, lesson customization, integration, and accessibility features as well as better large bulk pricing, while .com provides more workplace preparation features and a free version with ads.

The best option depends on your educational needs and priorities. We wish you the best as you choose a keyboarding curriculum for your students!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *